Down With Gravity! Why Defying Gravity is My New Favorite Show

First of all, it’s time that someone stepped up and told gravity to go screw itself. I’m tired of walking on the floor. Maybe sometimes I want to walk on the ceiling. In the new sci-fi drama Defying Gravity the eight characters who have been chosen for a six-year mission around the solar system have that luxury. Lucky bastards.

Defying Gravity cast
they’re the ones in grey here

Now, the two descriptions of the show I see floating around most often are “eight astronauts go on a six-year mission around the solar system” and “Grey’s Anatomy in space”. One makes it sound like a boring Discovery-channel documentary with terrible fake CGI cinematics and the other makes it sound like a chick show with the depth of the teaspoon. In reality, it’s neither.

Defying Gravity is a genre-crossing show that you will probably like if only you would bother to watch an episode or two. Or you can click below and let me tell you why you should watch.


Each episode intercuts the “present day” (where we follow both the astronauts on their mission and the personnel down in Mission Control)…

Defying Gravity's present
to boldly go and all that, Houston

…with the “past,” where they’re all together training and competing to be chosen…

astronaut school
it’s like astronaut school

…deftly weaving the scenes thematically around that week’s core concept (like making tough choices or overcoming an obstacle), including tonally-appropriate music in place of “I am having an emotion, let us spell it out for the viewers so the writers don’t have to rely on my acting” discussions with each other.

Including both timelines serves the dual purposes of making the characters more complex and circumventing the fact that it would be next to impossible to introduce new characters onto a ship millions of kilometers from Earth.

There’s the engineering issues and day-to-day astronaut awesomeness for the nerd crowd, complete with believable-sounding scientific mumbo jumbo:

iPod 4
their ship even looks like an ipod on the inside

There’s the personal/relationship issues and emotional baggage that everyone has regardless of whether they’re a garbage collector or a rocket scientist:

Rollie and Ajay
“That’s it. I’m taking a personal day.”

There’s the mystery of not really knowing where you’re going, what you’ll find when you get there, or even what’s going on in your own head.

naked floating Zoe
“Why am I floating through the airlock naked in this dream?”

And they’re intertwined in such a way as to create a total picture of what it’s like to be involved with a long space voyage. The engineering problems are metaphors for the personal issues and the personal issues exacerbate the engineering problems and everybody’s got an opinion on the issues, from abortion to religion. So in its parts it’s Grey’s Anatomy and Star Trek and Lost but as a whole it’s a lot more.

It’s about having someone you can trust to pull you through the tough times.

Evram and Claire
so you can have cute moments like this

It’s about feeling like a part of something bigger.

meeting room
“Boy, Earth sure is a long way away.”

And about the loneliness of being left behind.

Ajay comes home

I love shows where I can’t figure out who my favorite character is, not because I don’t care about any of them (sorry, CSI) but because they’re all so fascinating/maddening/mysterious/adorable. Who will it be this week?

Donner
tragic American hero Maddux Donner (Ron Livingston) and his love square?

Jen and Zoe
ass-kicker BBFs Jen Crane (Christina Cox) and Zoe Barnes (Laura Harris)?

Evram
the extremely capable yet emotionally scarred Dr. Evram Mintz (Eyal Podell)?

Wass and Ajay
Steve Wassenfelder (Dylan Taylor) and Ajay Sharma (Zahf Paroo), nerdtastic science boys who are 12 and a half going on Yoda?

Rollie
Rollie Crane (Ty Olsson), the CapCom whose wife is on a six-year mission with her ex?

Paula and Wass
crazy Paula “Puke” Morales (Paula Garces) and her cute classroom in space?

Goss and Eve
or Eve Weller-Shaw (Karen LeBlanc) and Mike Goss (Andrew Airlie), who are obviously not telling us everything?

There are definitely some detractors of the show out there, most of whom come from the so-called “hard” sci-fi crowd, who seem to think that unless a story is set in the year 20 billion (Defying Gravity is set in the 2050s) or in another galaxy, the onus is on the writers to explain every single thing that goes on using only today’s knowledge of physics.

They bring up things like the lack of a time delay in the Antares’ communications with Earth, the gravity mechanics, that the astronauts are wearing libido inhibitors (called HALOs), and the fact that the ISO (international NASA equivalent) seems to reward obedience more than ingenuity, as evidence that the show is “unrealistic” (which equals bad in their books.)

trick or treat
I dunno about you, but if I was in space, I would totally trick-or-treat

To those people I say, the ISO isn’t NASA. The radios are probably not actually radios, and if you think you can put eight people into space for a year and not have them humping like bunnies out of sheer boredom, you need to have your head examined.

making out
a scene from every camp, school, ship, organization, and street corner in the world

I’m a “hard” sci-fi fan myself, but I’m sorry, but if Star Trek or 2001 is realistic then my left foot is the governing body of Papua New Guinea.

transporters are wacky

Make-believe science (e.g. transporters) and magical forces (e.g. monoliths, the force) are the ubiquitous explanations for things on other sci-fi shows/movies/books…

the monolith
it just DOES THINGS, okay, because ALIENS made it

…and I don’t see how that’s asking you to suspend your disbelief less than a show that has its characters using floor-attracting nanotechnology outfits and magnetic hairspray whenever they’re outside their spinning living quarters.

The only show that’s avoided such “realism” bickering among viewers is Battlestar Galactica (the new one) by the simple expedient of not explaining anything at all.

the CIC
“Quick! Someone push the ‘go’ button!”

Every show has its glitches (what, they could re-grow Worf’s spine on Star Trek: the Next Generation but not Captain Picard’s hair?), so what it all comes down to is: does the show suck you in enough that you don’t care when you notice these little blips? In Defying Gravity’s case, my answer is a resounding yes.

The worry in the States is that ABC, who airs the show there…

Defying Gravity logo
and loves to slap its logo all over everything

…will cancel the series, because it’s been being juggled around the schedule due to low ratings. Fortunately, whatever dumbfuckery the American network gets up to, it doesn’t have the sole voice in determining whether the show sticks around. It’s a co-production between the USA, Canada, Britain, and Germany, so hopefully less-idiotic heads will prevail.

ABC is dumb

As for you, go and do your part to keep Defying Gravity around. Click on over to CTV.ca or ABC.com (depending on where you are) to watch full episodes online and register on the networks’ web traffic tickers. Then watch in on TV to boost the ratings.

If we want shows like Defying Gravity instead of Gimmicky Cop Show #412: a New York detective teams up with a Native American shaman who controls tornadoes, or Reality Show #5,284: we put some assholes in a house with no forks and see what happens, we need to do our part to help it stay alive. I just did mine by telling you about it. Your turn.

Buy Defying Gravity on DVD

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)
This entry was posted in: Forays into TV
Tags: , , , .
Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Down With Gravity! Why Defying Gravity is My New Favorite Show

Yeah, I’ve been enjoying DG. It’s not the greatest show on Earth, but it’s definitely more than enjoyable. And it’s engaged me enough that everytime I see Goss I want to kick him in the teeth, so props to that.

And frankly, nine episodes in, I want more wacky sexnanigans. So suck it, hardcore whoever-os. I say bring on the making out in space!broom cupboards. 😉

Yeah I feel the same way, both about the show and Goss. I’m rapidly becoming obsessed with it, I like it better than any of the other shows that are on now, but it’s no Battlestar or X-Files or Firefly. And Goss is a douche. I’m hoping they’ll give his character a little more depth so he doesn’t seem so arbitrarily evil (they’re obviously still holding a lot back, so I have hopes). Nadia’s another one who needs fleshing out (flesh! ha ha, get it, cause she’s a slut?). She’s pretty 1-dimensional right now.

I agree with you on the sexnanigans (awesome word, btw!). I think they’re just working on establishing the plots and mysteries and stuff for now then they’ll move into the love octagons or whatever. I find my favorite parts of the show are the training flashbacks because that’s where all the good relationship scenes are (especially poor Rollie pining after Jen). At least they’ve got the HALOs off now, though. That’s a good start.

It’s really a shame they separated Claire/Evram and Rollie/Jenn for the mission. They were the cutest couples. I’m hoping they didn’t shoot themselves in the foot by giving so many of them Earthside parters. It limits what can go on in space unless they want to stray into sleazebag cheater territory. I kind of feel like Jen should be blown out of the airlock if she cheats on Rollie because he’s so upstanding and puppylike while Ted is kind of a macho dick.

  • Pingback: Avatar Photo Movie Review |()

  • SUBSCRIBE TO ZE EMAILS

    Subscribe to Ze Feeds

    Archives

    Links by Google